🔒

Medical Intelligence

Protected health information. Enter password to continue.

Initializing Database...

Chemo Tracker v2

Tracker
Analysis
Notes
Nutrition
Report
--
Cycle Day

Daily Metrics

5
5
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

Sleep & Activity

Nutrition & Wellness

CA-125

Medications

Prescriptions
Supplements

Custom Symptoms

Notes

Recent Entries

DateCycleEnergyMoodPainSleepStepsCal

Medication Adherence

Full dose
Half dose
2+ doses
Not taken
Cycle boundary
Prescriptions
Supplements

Social & Engagement

USDA API Key

Get a free key at fdc.nal.usda.gov

Search Foods

Daily Food Log

0
Calories
0g
Protein
0g
Fat
0g
Fiber
FoodSrvCalProteinFatCarbsFiber

Post-Frontline Recurrence-Prevention Strategy

Post-Frontline Recurrence-Prevention Strategy for Stage IV High-Grade Serous Tubo-Ovarian Carcinoma

A Personalized Mechanistic Analysis

Patient: Claire Gribbin | DOB: February 26, 1967 (Age 59) | Date: May 14, 2026 Oncologist: Dr. Amy BonDurant, Swedish Cancer Institute Gynecologic Oncology

Section 1: Executive Summary

Patient Profile

A 59-year-old woman with newly diagnosed Stage IV high-grade serous carcinoma of tubo-ovarian origin (HGSOC). Tumor genomics reveal a distinctive profile: HRD-negative (HRDsig 0.14), BRCA1/2 wildtype, PIK3CA H1047L activating kinase domain mutation (VAF 63.1%), TP53 M1K (start-loss), HER2 IHC 2+, FOLR1=0, microsatellite stable, TMB 5 mut/Mb (low), and PD-L1 CPS 0. Disease distribution includes peritoneal implants, ascites, retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy, sigmoid tethering, colon mesentery involvement, bladder peritoneum, diaphragmatic nodules, and right pleural effusion. She is currently receiving neoadjuvant carboplatin/paclitaxel/bevacizumab with interval debulking surgery planned after cycle 3. Germline testing (Ambry 77-gene panel) revealed only a POLE R1324H VUS in the C-terminal domain (non-actionable). Clinical considerations include emerging paclitaxel neuropathy, neutropenia approaching severe after cycle 2, A1c 5.8% (borderline prediabetes), B12 deficiency (177 pg/mL), and bilateral patellofemoral arthroplasty (2024, healed).

Core Biological Narrative

This cancer occupies a challenging but not hopeless molecular niche. It is HRD-negative — meaning PARP inhibitors provide minimal benefit and expected median PFS with bevacizumab maintenance alone is approximately 16–18 months. However, the near-clonal PIK3CA H1047L mutation (unusual in HGSOC, typically found at 3–7% frequency) creates both a therapeutic vulnerability and metabolic target that can be exploited through next-generation mutant-selective PI3Kα inhibitors, metabolic optimization, and future combination strategies. The immune-cold profile (MSS, TMB-low, PD-L1=0) makes standard checkpoint immunotherapy ineffective, but macrophage/innate immune targeting and intraperitoneal approaches represent emerging opportunities. Bevacizumab is especially rational given the VEGF-dependent phenotype evidenced by ascites and pleural effusion.

Top 8 Ranked Post-Frontline Strategies

RankStrategyCategoryTiming

1Bevacizumab maintenance (15 months)Standard of careImmediately post-frontline
2Mutant-selective PI3Kα inhibitor trial (STX-478)Trial-basedAt first recurrence (establish eligibility now)
3ctDNA monitoring (Signatera) for MRD/recurrenceGuideline-supported (Medicare-covered)Post-surgery baseline, then Q3 months
4Metabolic optimization (metformin, CGM, exercise, statin continuation)Biologically plausible / low-riskImmediately
5Tissue banking + molecular tumor board referral (Fred Hutch/UW)Clinical preparationBefore/at surgery
6WEE1/PKMYT1 inhibitor trial (azenosertib)Trial-basedAt platinum-resistant recurrence
7Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) or Trop-2 ADCOff-label / trial-basedAt platinum-resistant recurrence
8Macrophage-targeting immunotherapy (SL-172154, CD47/CD24 axis)Trial-basedAt recurrence (Fred Hutch)


Section 2: Biological Interpretation — What Makes This Case Typical vs. Atypical

Typical HGSOC Features

  • TP53 mutation (>96% of HGSOC harbor TP53 alterations): The M1K start-loss mutation is consistent with TP53 loss of function, confirmed by abnormal p53 overexpression on IHC.
  • Peritoneal/transcoelomic dissemination pattern: Ascites, peritoneal implants, omental/mesenteric involvement, and diaphragmatic nodules represent the classic HGSOC spread pattern.
  • Stage IV with low-volume pleural disease: Right-sided pleural effusion with diaphragmatic nodules is the most common mechanism of Stage IV upstaging in HGSOC (transdiaphragmatic lymphatic drainage).
  • WT1+/PAX8+ immunophenotype: Confirms müllerian serous lineage.
  • CA-125 elevation (464 U/mL): Typical for advanced HGSOC.

Atypical Features

  • PIK3CA H1047L (VAF 63.1%): Highly atypical for HGSOC. PIK3CA activating mutations occur in only 3–7% of HGSOC versus 33–50% of clear cell and 20–40% of endometrioid ovarian carcinoma. The near-clonal VAF (63.1%) indicates this is a truncal/founding event, not a late subclonal acquisition. This raises the question of whether this tumor has "clear-cell-like" molecular features embedded within morphologic HGSOC — sometimes called "molecular mixed biology." The WT1+ staining argues against pure clear cell, but additional IHC (HNF1β, Napsin A, ARID1A, ER/PR) at debulking surgery would clarify. European Journal of Translational and Clinical Medicine

  • HRD-negative status (HRDsig 0.14): While ~40% of HGSOC are HRD-negative, this profoundly low score indicates fully intact homologous recombination repair — the strongest predictor of lack of benefit from PARP inhibitor maintenance. It also predicts shorter platinum-free interval (median PFS ~16–18 months with bevacizumab). The clinical challenges of HRP in ovarian cancer

  • HER2 IHC 2+ in HGSOC: Not commonly tested or reported. ~28% of ovarian cancers show HER2 IHC 2+. Notably, PIK3CA mutations are more prevalent in HER2 2+/3+ ovarian tumors, suggesting biological co-occurrence. FISH/ISH should be completed. Zhang et al., Sci Rep 2024

  • FOLR1=0: Approximately 35–40% of HGSOC are FRα-high; this patient's FOLR1-negative status excludes mirvetuximab soravtansine unless expression changes at recurrence.

  • Immune-cold profile (MSS, TMB 5, CPS 0): While not uncommon in HGSOC, the combination of all three negative biomarkers plus HRD-negative status creates a quadruple-negative immunotherapy profile with essentially no evidence base for standard checkpoint inhibitor benefit.

Synthetic Interpretation

This tumor represents a PI3K-driven, HR-proficient, immune-cold HGSOC — a molecular subtype that is resistant to both PARP inhibitors and checkpoint immunotherapy, but potentially vulnerable to:

1. PI3K pathway-directed therapy (the mutation itself is targetable)

2. Anti-angiogenic therapy (VEGF-driven effusions predict bevacizumab benefit)

3. Replication stress exploiters (WEE1/ATR inhibitors given TP53 loss + intact HR)

4. Metabolic intervention (PI3K-driven glucose addiction)

5. Innate immune approaches (macrophage-targeting bypasses T-cell coldness)


Section 3: Mechanisms of Recurrence (Ranked by Plausibility)

RankMechanismPlausibilityKey EvidenceBiomarkers to ConfirmMapped Interventions

1Peritoneal niche-protected residual diseaseVery HighExtensive peritoneal/mesenteric/diaphragmatic disease creates multiple sanctuary sites; microscopic submesothelial deposits survive R0 surgeryCRS score at surgery (low CRS = more viable residual); post-op ctDNA positivityBevacizumab (anti-VEGF disrupts niche), HIPEC (investigational), IP therapy trials
2PI3K-driven platinum toleranceVery HighPIK3CA H1047L (63.1% VAF) confers universal anti-apoptotic/pro-survival signaling (BAD phosphorylation, NF-κB), reducing platinum kill fraction across all residual cellsPIK3CA ctDNA persistence post-chemo; organoid platinum sensitivity testingPI3K inhibitors (STX-478, alpelisib), metformin (AMPK/mTOR opposition), PI3Ki+PARPi combinations
3Drug-tolerant persister cells (ATF3+/partial EMT)HighHRp biology + PI3K activation creates ideal conditions for non-genetic persistence; ATF3+ DTPs confirmed in all HGSOC scRNA-seq datasetsOrganoid re-challenge assays; EMT marker expression (vimentin, ZEB1) on surgical IHCEpigenetic therapies, ferroptosis inducers (FZD7+ persisters), PI3K inhibition
4Cancer stem cells enriched by platinumHighAscites + IL-6 + PI3K activation synergistically drive CSC enrichment; ALDH+ spheroid formation confirmed by ascites presentationALDH1A1 IHC on surgical specimen; flow cytometry of ascites for CD133+/ALDH+Anti-CSC trials, Wnt inhibitors, IL-6 blocking, metformin (reduces CSC markers)
5Ascites-associated anoikis-resistant spheroidsHighActive ascites at presentation confirms this compartment exists and regenerates after drainageAscites volume at surgery; tumor spheroid count in washingsBevacizumab (reduces VEGF/permeability), CSF1R inhibition (reverses vascular leakage)
6HRp-mediated efficient DNA repairModerate-HighIntact HR directly reduces platinum-induced cell death; HRDsig 0.14 predicts reduced platinum efficacyPlatinum-free interval post-treatment; CRS on surgical specimenWEE1/ATR inhibitors (exploit replication stress despite intact HR); ATRi+AKTi synergy
7Lymphatic micrometastasesModerateEstablished retroperitoneal LN involvement means residual intranodal disease persists beyond surgical fieldLymph node status at surgery; retroperitoneal recurrence pattern on surveillanceSurveillance imaging of retroperitoneum; systemic (not IP) therapy at recurrence
8Transdiaphragmatic/pleural dormant depositsModerateDiaphragmatic and pleural disease confirms this dissemination axis is active; micro-deposits in pleural recesses are surgically inaccessiblePleural recurrence on CT; ctDNA positivity from pleural cloneSystemic therapy; bevacizumab (addresses effusion biology)
9Immune evasion (CPS 0, MSS, TMB-low)ModerateNo immune pressure to control residual disease; recurrence proceeds unchecked by adaptive immunityCD8 TIL density at surgery; immune gene expressionMacrophage-targeting (SL-172154, CD47/CD24), IP CAR-T, oncolytic virus
10Replication-stress-driven clonal evolutionModerateOngoing CIN generates heterogeneity enabling selection of fully resistant clonesEmergence of new mutations on serial ctDNA; CCNE1 amplificationWEE1i (azenosertib), PKMYT1i+WEE1i (lunresertib+zedoresertib)


Section 4: Ranked Post-Frontline Courses of Action

Summary Table

RankStrategyEvidenceExpected BenefitToxicityCategoryTiming

1Bevacizumab maintenance (15 mo)Phase III (GOG-0218, ICON7)PFS +3.8 mo; OS +5 mo in Stage IVHTN, proteinuria, bowel perf risk (5-11% with sigmoid involvement)Standard of careImmediately
2STX-478 (mutant-selective PI3Kα inhibitor) trialPhase 1/2 (44% ORR in gyn cancers)Durable responses; ctDNA decline 86%Minimal hyperglycemia; well-toleratedTrial-basedFirst recurrence
3Signatera ctDNA surveillanceValidated (100% sensitivity, 10-mo lead time)Earlier recurrence detection; prognostic stratificationAnxiety of early detection; no RCT for interventionGuideline-supportedPost-surgery
4Metabolic optimization (metformin + CGM + exercise + statin)Preclinical (H1047R-specific data); Phase II clinicalBiologically plausible recurrence delay; QOL improvementMinimal (GI for metformin)Biologically plausibleImmediately
5Fred Hutch/UW molecular tumor board + tissue bankingClinical preparationEnsures trial readiness; organoid drug testingNoneClinical standardBefore surgery
6WEE1 inhibitor (azenosertib) trialPhase 2/3 (ASPENOVA, DENALI)50-60% ORR with PKMYT1i in CCNE1+Myelosuppression, GITrial-basedPlatinum-resistant recurrence
7T-DXd or Trop-2 ADCPhase II/III (ORR 27-43% in ovarian)Meaningful responses without neuropathyILD (rare), GI, cytopeniasOff-label / trialPlatinum-resistant recurrence
8Macrophage/innate immune therapyPhase I/Ib (SL-172154, CD47/CD24 axis)Novel mechanism for immune-cold tumorsTBD (early data shows safety)Trial-basedRecurrence (Fred Hutch)

Detailed Narrative

1. Bevacizumab Maintenance (15 Months)

Biological rationale: This patient's ascites and pleural effusion are direct evidence of VEGF-dependent vascular permeability. The NRG Oncology/GOG analysis of GOG-0218 demonstrated that patients WITH ascites derived significant PFS (HR 0.71, p<0.001) AND OS (HR 0.82, p=0.014) benefit from bevacizumab, while patients without ascites did not. The ICON7 high-risk subgroup (Stage IV) showed OS improvement of 7.8 months (36.6 vs 28.8 months, HR 0.64, p=0.002). The KELIM biomarker analysis further identifies HRD-negative patients with poor chemosensitivity as deriving the greatest bevacizumab benefit. NRG/GOG Ascites Analysis Evidence level: Phase III, Level I. Standard of care per NCCN/ESMO for Stage IV HRD-negative HGSOC. Expected benefit: Median PFS ~16-18 months with bevacizumab maintenance (vs. ~10-12 without); possible OS benefit in Stage IV. Risks: Hypertension (20-40%), proteinuria, GI perforation (elevated risk 5-11% given sigmoid tethering), thromboembolism. Requires 4-6 week surgical washout. Key management: Hold bevacizumab ≥4-6 weeks before IDS; resume ≥4 weeks post-surgery with confirmed wound healing. Surgeon should plan for possible segmental sigmoid resection. Prior PFA (2024) is NOT a wound-healing concern (fully healed). AGO-OVAR 17 BOOST showed no benefit from extending beyond 15 months.

2. Mutant-Selective PI3Kα Inhibitor Trial (STX-478)

Biological rationale: PIK3CA H1047L is the identical kinase-domain hotspot position as H1047R, constitutively activating PI3Kα. STX-478 is a first-generation mutant-selective allosteric PI3Kα inhibitor that spares wild-type enzyme — dramatically reducing the hyperglycemia, rash, and diarrhea that limited alpelisib. ESMO 2024 data: 44% ORR in gynecologic cancers (monotherapy), tumor reductions in 72% of all patients, ctDNA decline in 86%. No treatment discontinuations due to adverse events. Scorpion/BioSpace 2024 Evidence level: Phase 1/2 with exceptional early signal. The most promising agent for this specific mutation. Expected benefit: 44% response rate; durable responses; well-tolerated. Feasibility: Currently enrolling at MD Anderson, Dana-Farber, UI Health Care. Not yet at a Seattle site but expansion cohorts include gynecologic cancers. RLY-2608 (zovegalisib) is an alternative mutant-selective PI3Kα inhibitor (NCT05216432) available at multiple sites. Timing: At first recurrence. Bank tissue at surgery to confirm PIK3CA H1047L and establish molecular eligibility.

3. ctDNA Monitoring (Signatera)

Biological rationale: Signatera tracks 16 patient-specific clonal variants via ultra-deep PCR (sensitivity ~0.01% VAF). For this patient, both TP53 M1K and PIK3CA H1047L would be tracked. Validated in ovarian cancer: 100% sensitivity and specificity for recurrence detection with 10-month lead time over imaging, compared to only 1 month for CA-125. Medicare-covered since February 2024. Natera Signatera Ovarian Validation, 2023 Expected benefit: Prognostic stratification (MRD-positive within 2.5 months = 7.6× recurrence risk); may enable earlier trial enrollment. Key caveat: No RCT proves intervention based on ctDNA positivity improves OS (the OV05 lesson). Use for risk stratification and trial eligibility, not automatic treatment trigger. Logistics: Submit tumor tissue from initial biopsy NOW to Natera for bespoke panel design (4-6 week turnaround). Post-surgery draw establishes baseline.

4. Metabolic Optimization Package

Biological rationale: PIK3CA H1047L creates a constitutively active PI3K→AKT→mTOR axis. Metformin activates AMPK, which directly opposes mTORC1. Preclinical data specific to H1047R (functionally equivalent to H1047L) showed >80% tumor growth inhibition with metformin — PIK3CA-mutant tumors are paradoxically more metformin-sensitive than wild-type because constitutive PI3K makes them independent of insulin but dependent on mTOR, which AMPK suppresses. Cufí et al., Oncotarget 2013 Components:
  • Metformin 500→1000 mg daily (discuss with Dr. BonDurant): addresses prediabetes (A1c 5.8%) + anti-cancer mechanism
  • CGM during chemotherapy: quantify dexamethasone hyperglycemia, guide dietary interventions, preserve PI3Ki trial eligibility (STX-478 excludes HbA1c ≥8%)
  • Exercise (150 min/week aerobic + 2-3× resistance): reduces IGF-1 by ~20 ng/ml, activates AMPK, improves insulin sensitivity
  • Atorvastatin continuation: mevalonate pathway inhibition has synergistic rationale with PI3K biology + mutant p53 mevalonate dependence

Evidence classification: Biologically plausible with mutation-specific preclinical support; no Phase III efficacy data in ovarian cancer. Low toxicity. Reasonable to implement.

5. Tissue Banking + Molecular Tumor Board (Fred Hutch/UW)

Rationale: Interval debulking surgery is the single best opportunity to collect diverse biospecimens. Fresh tissue for organoid culture enables future drug sensitivity testing (platinum, PI3K inhibitors, novel agents). Fred Hutch/UW molecular tumor board can review the PIK3CA/TP53 profile, POLE VUS, and guide trial strategy. Key actions: Coordinate ≥1 week pre-surgery with pathology and Fred Hutch organoid lab; request CRS scoring, expanded IHC, fresh-frozen tissue, ascites collection; refer for molecular tumor board review.

6. WEE1/PKMYT1 Inhibitor Trial

Biological rationale: TP53 M1K (loss of function) eliminates the G1 checkpoint, making this tumor dependent on the G2/M checkpoint (WEE1-mediated) for DNA repair. WEE1 inhibition forces cells with unrepaired DNA into mitosis → mitotic catastrophe. This mechanism is independent of HRD status. The MYTHIC trial (lunresertib + zedoresertib: PKMYT1i + WEE1i) showed 50% ORR in ovarian cancer and 60% in CCNE1-amplified tumors, receiving FDA Fast Track Designation (April 2026). MYTHIC AACR 2026 Timing: Platinum-resistant recurrence. Test for CCNE1 amplification on surgical tissue — if present, this becomes a top-priority trial.

7. ADC Strategy (T-DXd or Trop-2 ADC)

Biological rationale: HER2 IHC 2+ enables T-DXd (ORR ~27% in IHC 2+ solid tumors per DESTINY-PanTumor02); Trop-2 is expressed in >80% of epithelial ovarian cancers. Datopotamab deruxtecan (Dato-DXd) showed 42.9% ORR in ovarian cancer at ESMO 2024. All topoisomerase-I based ADCs avoid neuropathy — critical given this patient's emerging paclitaxel neuropathy precludes taxane rechallenge. Oaknin et al., ESMO 202402295-6/fulltext) Timing: Platinum-resistant recurrence (where ORR for standard chemo is only 10-15%). Consider earlier if neuropathy prevents taxane use at first recurrence.

8. Macrophage/Innate Immune Therapy

Biological rationale: This immune-cold tumor (CPS 0, MSS, TMB-low) is dominated by immunosuppressive M2 macrophages in the peritoneal microenvironment. Standard checkpoint inhibitors have failed (IMagyn050, JAVELIN 200, NINJA all negative). The CD47/SIRPα axis (SL-172154) and CD24/Siglec-10 axis represent targetable innate immune checkpoints. SL-172154 simultaneously blocks CD47 and agonizes CD40, bridging innate to adaptive immunity. Phase I showed acceptable safety with pharmacodynamic evidence of macrophage activation. SL-172154 Phase I, J Immunother Cancer 2025 Timing: At recurrence. Request CD47 and CD24 IHC at surgery to confirm target expression.

Section 5: Clinical Trial Strategy

Priority Trials by Category

PI3K Pathway Trials

AgentTrial / NCTPhaseBiomarkerSettingSeattle Access

STX-478NCT057681391/2PIK3CA-mutant solid tumorsRecurrent (gyn expansion)MD Anderson, Dana-Farber (expanding)
RLY-2608 (zovegalisib)NCT052164321/2PIK3CA-mutant solid tumorsRecurrentColumbia, Yale, multi-site
Alpelisib + OlaparibEPIK-O (NCT04729387)3Platinum-resistant HGSOCRecurrentMulti-center (completed enrollment; results available)
CapivasertibNCI-MATCH / ComboMATCH2AKT/PI3K-alteredRecurrentNCI network including SCCA/UW
ETX-636NCT069938441/2PIK3CA-mutantRecurrentWA, CA, TX, NC, VA, CT, MA

DDR / Replication Stress Trials

AgentTrial / NCTPhaseBiomarkerSettingSeattle Access

Azenosertib (WEE1i)ASPENOVA (NCT07546500/GOG-3147)3Cyclin E1+Platinum-resistantMulti-center GOG (check Fred Hutch)
Lunresertib + ZedoresertibMYTHIC expansion1/2CCNE1/FBXW7/PPP2R1APlatinum-resistantMD Anderson (may expand)
Ceralasertib + OlaparibCAPRI-22PARPi-resistantRecurrentAcademic centers

ADC / HER2 Trials

AgentTrial / NCTPhaseBiomarkerSettingSeattle Access

T-DXd + BevacizumabDESTINY-Ovarian013HER2-expressingFirst-line maintenanceEnrolling — check eligibility
Dato-DXd (Trop-2)TROPION-PanTumor032Trop-2+RecurrentNCT05489211
Sacituzumab govitecanNCI-2024-000742Trop-2+Platinum-resistantNCI cooperative group
QLS5132 (CLDN6)Phase 1/21/2CLDN6+Platinum-resistantExpanding

Immunotherapy / Macrophage Trials

AgentTrial / NCTPhaseTargetSettingSeattle Access

SL-172154Phase Ib combo1bCD47/CD40Platinum-resistantMulti-site (check SCCA)
Evorpacept (ALX148)IST Phase 22SIRPαRecurrent OCCheck site status
Maplirpacept + PLDPhase 1 expansion1SIRPα-FcPlatinum-resistantMulti-site

ctDNA-Guided / Surveillance

AgentTrialPhaseDesignNotes

SignateraCommercial (Medicare-covered)ValidatedSerial Q3 month surveillanceOrder now for panel design


Section 6: Tissue and Data Acquisition Plan (Interval Debulking Surgery)

Tier 1: Clinically Ordered (Standard — No Special Arrangement)

ItemPurposeWho Coordinates

FFPE blocks from all resected sites (ovary, peritoneum, mesentery, diaphragm, LNs)Histology, IHC, future NGSRoutine pathology
Pre-op blood (CA-125, CBC, CMP)Baseline markersStandard pre-op
Chemotherapy Response Score (CRS)Prognostic (grades viable tumor vs. fibrosis post-NACT)Explicitly request on pathology requisition
IHC panel: CD8, FOXP3, CD68, CD163, CD47, MHC-I (HLA-ABC)Immune microenvironment characterizationAdd-on order through oncology → pathology
Additional IHC: HNF1β, ARID1A, ER/PR, HER2 (repeat on solid tissue)Characterize PIK3CA-associated biologyAdd-on order
FOLR1 re-testing (Ventana FOLR1-2.1 RxDx assay)Mirvetuximab eligibilityMust specify Ventana companion diagnostic
Repeat NGS (FoundationOne CDx or Tempus)Updated mutation profile, CCNE1 status, copy numberOrder through oncology

Tier 2: Pathology Coordination Required (Arrange ≥1 Week Pre-Surgery)

ItemPurposeLogistics

Fresh-frozen tumor (≥2 sites)RNA-seq, methylation, WESAlert frozen section room; tissue to liquid nitrogen within 30 min
Fresh tumor for organoid cultureDrug sensitivity testingTransport media (Advanced DMEM/F12 + antibiotics on ice); pre-arrange Fred Hutch/UW organoid lab pickup
Ascites/peritoneal washings (fresh)Immune profiling (flow cytometry), organoid derivationSterile container on ice; research lab processes within 2-4 hours

Tier 3: Blood-Based (Pre-Op / Day-Of)

ItemPurposeTiming

ctDNA baseline (Signatera)MRD tracking post-opPre-op draw; submit tumor tissue NOW for panel design (4-6 week lead time)
PBMCs (heparin tubes)Immune repertoire, TCR sequencingDay-of surgery; process within 6 hours
Metabolic panel: fasting insulin, glucose, IGF-1, HbA1c, vitamin D, CRP, IL-6Metabolic/inflammatory baselineStandard lab draw
BRCA1 promoter methylation (on tumor)May reveal epigenetic HRD → PARPi eligibilityCan be ordered on FFPE retrospectively

Tier 4: Research Protocol (Requires IRB/Consent — Coordinate with Fred Hutch)

ItemPurposeNotes

Single-cell RNA-seq (scRNA-seq)Tumor ecosystem mappingFresh dissociation within 1-2 hours; Fred Hutch STTR
Spatial transcriptomics (Visium/MERFISH)In-situ immune architectureOCT-embedded fresh-frozen; specialized core
Platinum-response comparisonPre-NACT biopsy vs. post-NACT tissuePairs molecular profiles for resistance analysis

Critical Logistics Checklist

  • [ ] NOW: Submit tumor from initial biopsy to Natera for Signatera panel design
  • [ ] 1 week pre-surgery: Meeting with surgical team + pathology to confirm specimen routing
  • [ ] 1 week pre-surgery: Arrange organoid transport with Fred Hutch/UW lab
  • [ ] 1 week pre-surgery: Obtain research consent if enrolling in Fred Hutch tissue banking protocol
  • [ ] Day of surgery: Fresh tissue in transport media → organoid lab; ascites on ice → research lab
  • [ ] Post-surgery: Request CRS, expanded IHC, FOLR1 Ventana re-test, CCNE1 status


Section 7: Surveillance Plan After Frontline Therapy

Integrated Surveillance Calendar

Months 0-24 Post-Completion of Frontline (High-Risk Period)

ModalityFrequencyEvidence LevelAction Threshold

Physical exam + pelvicEvery 3 monthsNCCN Category 2A (proven)New mass, ascites, adenopathy
CA-125Every 3 monthsNCCN Category 2A (caveat: bev suppresses CA-125)Confirmed doubling from nadir; correlate with imaging
CT chest/abdomen/pelvisEvery 4-6 months (or as indicated)Moderate (not routine per NCCN but rational for Stage IV)RECIST progression
ctDNA (Signatera)Every 3 monthsValidated (10-mo lead time) — informationalMRD positivity → intensified imaging + trial eligibility discussion
Metabolic markers (A1c, fasting insulin, CRP, vitamin D)Every 6 monthsObservational; modifiable riskManage per targets

Months 25-60

ModalityFrequencyNotes

Physical exam + CA-125Every 4-6 monthsStandard
CTAnnually or as indicatedReduce frequency if ctDNA persistently negative
ctDNAEvery 6 monthsConsider stopping if negative through year 3

Key Interpretive Caveats

  • CA-125 on bevacizumab: Bev independently suppresses CA-125 via anti-permeability effects. A CA-125 rise at bev cessation (month 15) is expected and does NOT automatically indicate progression. Confirm with imaging.
  • ctDNA as prognostic, not prescriptive: MRD positivity post-surgery predicts recurrence (7.6× risk) but no RCT proves acting on it improves OS. Use for: (1) intensified surveillance, (2) trial eligibility, (3) maintenance duration discussion.


Section 8: Quality-of-Life & Longevity Optimization

URGENT Actions (Before Cycle 3)

ActionRationaleCategory

Correct B12 deficiency (methylcobalamin 5000 mcg/day sublingual)B12=177 compounds paclitaxel neuropathy; correctable cause of nerve damageStandard clinical recommendation
Implement cryotherapy (frozen gloves/socks during paclitaxel infusion)Reduces Grade ≥2 CIPN by 42-50% (2025 meta-analysis)Reasonable low-risk adjunctive
Add G-CSF prophylaxis (pegfilgrastim, cycle 3 onward)Neutropenia approaching severe after cycle 2; expected worseningStandard clinical recommendation
*Check 23andMe for CYP2C83 (rs10509681) and ABCB1* (rs1045642)CYP2C83 carriers have 2.1× neuropathy risk + 2.1× neutropenia risk on carbo/taxolReasonable low-risk adjunctive

Exercise Program

Category: Standard clinical recommendation (Level I evidence)
  • During chemo: 150 min/week moderate aerobic (cycling, swimming — ideal with bilateral PFA) + 2-3× resistance training
  • Prehab before IDS: Structured exercise 3-6 weeks pre-surgery reduces complications 20-50%
  • Avoid: Deep squats, lunges >90° knee flexion, plyometrics, running on hard surfaces
  • Specific benefits with PI3K biology: Exercise activates AMPK (opposes mTOR), reduces IGF-1 by ~20 ng/ml, improves insulin sensitivity
  • CIPN benefit: ECHO trial (JAMA Network Open 2023) showed exercise significantly reduces CIPN severity in ovarian cancer

Neuropathy Management

  • Current status: Grade 1-2 (fingertip numbness, thumb/index) after cycle 2
  • B12 correction: URGENT — compounds taxane neuropathy
  • Cryotherapy: Start cycle 3 (frozen gloves/socks 15 min before, during, 15 min after paclitaxel)
  • Consider duloxetine 30 mg prophylactically (2024 RCT shows prevention benefit)
  • Dose modification threshold: If symptoms progress to Grade 2 (functional impairment) → reduce paclitaxel to 135 mg/m²
  • Pharmacogenomics: CYP2C83 carriers have slower paclitaxel clearance → higher cumulative nerve exposure

Nutrition & Metabolic

InterventionRecommendationCategory

Protein 1.2-1.5 g/kg/day84-105g/day for muscle preservation; leucine-rich sourcesStandard
Mediterranean diet patternAnti-inflammatory; reduces CRP, IL-6Reasonable adjunctive
Vitamin D supplementation (4000-5000 IU/day)Target 40-60 ng/mL (was 39.4, prior 23.7)Standard
B12 5000 mcg methylcobalamin dailyTarget >500 pg/mL; urgent given 177 + neuropathyStandard
CGM during chemo cyclesQuantify dexamethasone hyperglycemia; guide dietReasonable adjunctive
Metformin 500→1000 mg/dayDiscuss with oncologist: A1c 5.8% + PIK3CA H1047L rationaleBiologically plausible
Fasting-mimicking (modified: 24-48h low-cal around infusion)Differential stress resistance; immune rejuvenationTrial-level evidence

Integrative Oncology

ModalityBest Evidence ForCategory

AcupunctureNausea (Cochrane), fatigue (meta-analysis), CIPN (NMA: superior to usual care)Reasonable adjunctive
CBT-I for insomnia2:30 AM wake pattern; superior to medicationsStandard recommendation
Mindfulness/MBSRAnxiety, depression, QOLStandard recommendation
Melatonin 3-5 mgSleep; may synergize with chemoReasonable adjunctive
Magnesium glycinate 200-400 mgSleep + nerve function (cofactor)Reasonable adjunctive

Evidence Tier Classification Key

TierDefinitionExamples

Standard clinical recommendationLevel I/II evidence; guideline-supportedG-CSF, B12, exercise, bevacizumab maintenance
Reasonable low-risk adjunctiveModerate evidence; favorable risk-benefitCryotherapy, CGM, acupuncture, Mediterranean diet
Biologically plausible / off-labelPreclinical + mechanistic rationale; no Phase IIIMetformin for PIK3CA-mutant, statin anti-cancer effect
Trial-basedEarly-phase clinical data; requires enrollmentSTX-478, WEE1i, SL-172154
SpeculativeTheoretical; should not drive care decisionsAcupuncture for myeloprotection, interstitium targeting


Questions for Dr. BonDurant (Oncologist) Before Surgery

1. Neuropathy management: Can we implement frozen gloves/socks for cycle 3? Should we consider prophylactic duloxetine given emerging symptoms at cycle 2?

2. Neutropenia: Given approaching-severe neutropenia after cycle 2, should pegfilgrastim be added starting cycle 3?

3. B12 deficiency: B12 is 177 (below normal) — this compounds paclitaxel neuropathy. Can we start high-dose supplementation immediately?

4. Bevacizumab washout: What is the planned washout duration before IDS? (Minimum 4-6 weeks recommended)

5. Bowel perforation risk: Given sigmoid tethering/stricture, has the surgical team planned for possible segmental sigmoid resection?

6. Metformin: Given A1c 5.8% and PIK3CA H1047L biology (preclinical data showing H1047-mutant tumors are metformin-sensitive), is there rationale to start metformin 500 mg?

7. CRS scoring: Will Chemotherapy Response Score be explicitly requested on the surgical pathology?

8. Signatera timing: Can we submit existing tumor tissue to Natera NOW for bespoke ctDNA panel design (4-6 week lead time)?

9. PARP inhibitor: To confirm — bevacizumab alone (not olaparib or niraparib) is the planned maintenance, given HRDsig 0.14?

10. Fred Hutch referral: Would you support a molecular tumor board referral and/or tissue routing to Fred Hutch for organoid culture?

Questions for Pathology Before Surgery

1. CRS scoring: Please score per Böhm criteria (3-tier CRS system) on the surgical specimen.

2. Expanded IHC: Can the following be ordered on the debulking specimen?

- Immune: CD8, FOXP3, CD68, CD163, CD47, MHC-I/HLA-ABC

- Biology: HNF1β, Napsin A, ARID1A (BAF250a), ER, PR

- Targets: HER2 (repeat on solid tissue), FOLR1 (Ventana FOLR1-2.1 RxDx assay)

3. Fresh tissue routing: Can fresh tumor from ≥2 sites be routed to: (a) liquid nitrogen for fresh-frozen, (b) transport media for organoid lab?

4. Ascites collection: If ascites is present at surgery, can a sterile aliquot be collected on ice for research processing?

5. FFPE from multiple sites: Please archive blocks from all distinct anatomic sites (ovary, peritoneum, mesentery, diaphragm, LNs, bowel if resected).

6. CCNE1 amplification: Can this be assessed on the repeat NGS panel?

Questions for Fred Hutch / UW Molecular Tumor Board

1. PIK3CA H1047L in HGSOC: This is atypical (3-7% frequency). Does the molecular tumor board recommend any additional characterization or reclassification consideration?

2. Trial matching: Given PIK3CA H1047L + TP53 M1K + HRD-negative, what trials are currently accessible through Fred Hutch/SCCA? Specifically: STX-478 (expanding to gyn cancers), ComboMATCH, or any PI3K pathway trials?

3. Organoid feasibility: Can Fred Hutch organoid core receive fresh tissue from IDS at Swedish? What is the logistics protocol?

4. POLE R1324H VUS: This is in the C-terminal domain. Do you concur it is non-actionable? Any new reclassification data?

5. 23andMe pharmacogenomics: Would the UW Medical Genetics team be willing to provide a focused pharmacogenomic interpretation of the 23andMe raw data (CYP2C8, ABCB1, GSTP1) for clinical record?

6. BRCA1 promoter methylation: Should this be tested on the surgical specimen to assess for epigenetic HRD that might expand PARPi eligibility?

7. CCNE1 status: If CCNE1 amplification is found, does this change the recurrence strategy (WEE1i/PKMYT1i trials)?

8. Mother's tissue: Would it be useful to request her pathology blocks from OSU for comparative genomics or POLE VUS segregation?


Evidence Classification Key

SymbolMeaning

⭐⭐⭐Phase III / Level I evidence; guideline-supported standard of care
⭐⭐Phase II or strong Phase I data; rational off-label or active enrollment
Preclinical or observational; biologically plausible but not clinically validated
🔬Research/translational only; no current clinical application


This report synthesizes findings from 8 parallel research tracks conducted May 14, 2026, incorporating the patient's FoundationOne CDx report, surgical pathology, Ambry 77-gene germline panel, 23andMe genome (546,603 SNPs), health records, and published medical literature (2020-2026). It is intended to support clinical discussion and does not constitute medical advice. All treatment decisions should be made in consultation with the treating oncology team.



ADDENDUM — Updated Data Integration & Frontier Possibilities

Added May 14, 2026, after review of additional source documents


A. Additional Source Documents Reviewed

DocumentKey Findings

CT Chest w Contrast (March 23, 2026)Bilateral pleural nodularity, small right pleural effusion, subcarinal LN 12mm, right paratracheal LN 10mm, 2mm and 5mm groundglass pulmonary nodules, perihepatic peritoneal fluid
CA-125 Trends (Swedish MyChart)Mar 20: 464 → Apr 9: 816.5 → Apr 29: 507.7 U/mL
CMP Trends (Feb 2023 – Apr 29, 2026)Glucose 92-97 (normal during chemo), creatinine 0.58-0.80, eGFR 85-104, albumin 4.5, all electrolytes normal
B12 + Folate (Mar 20, 2026)B12: 262 pg/mL (low-normal), Folate: 17.3 (normal)
CEA (Mar 20, 2026)1.6 ng/mL (normal — rules out GI primary)
Chemo Tracking SpreadsheetPaclitaxel 339mg, Carboplatin 714mg, Bevacizumab 1200mg (from cycle 2). Dexamethasone 8mg x3-4 days per cycle. Detailed supplement tracking, sleep, nutrition, exercise data


B. CA-125 Kinetics — Critical Update

DateCA-125 (U/mL)Context

Dec 20235.2Baseline (normal)
Oct 20205.8Prior baseline (normal)
Mar 20, 2026464Pre-treatment (diagnostic)
Apr 9, 2026816.5Day 1 of Cycle 1 (pre-infusion draw)
Apr 29, 2026507.7Day 1 of Cycle 2 (with bevacizumab added)

Interpretation:

The rise from 464 → 816.5 between March 20 and April 9 (20 days) likely represents continued tumor growth in the interval before chemotherapy began. This is NOT a treatment failure — it is the natural trajectory before therapy took effect.

The decline from 816.5 → 507.7 (38% drop) after just one cycle of carboplatin/paclitaxel is a favorable early response signal. The KELIM model (CA-125 elimination kinetics) uses early CA-125 slope to predict chemosensitivity. A >50% decline after 2 cycles is considered favorable; this patient is tracking toward that threshold.

Bevacizumab caveat: Bev was added at cycle 2 (Apr 29). Bevacizumab can independently suppress CA-125 through anti-VEGF effects on vascular permeability, making it harder to distinguish true tumor kill from bev-mediated CA-125 suppression in subsequent readings. The post-cycle-3 CA-125 will be more interpretable. No change to report recommendations: Early CA-125 response is encouraging and consistent with platinum sensitivity. This reinforces bevacizumab maintenance as the rational backbone strategy.

C. CT Chest (March 23, 2026) — Baseline Thoracic Disease

Key findings:
  • Subtle bilateral pleural nodularity (mm-scale, along fissures and pleural surfaces)
  • Small dependent right pleural effusion
  • Subcarinal lymph nodes up to 12mm, right paratracheal up to 10mm
  • 2mm and 5mm groundglass pulmonary nodules (may be inflammatory or metastatic)
  • Perihepatic peritoneal fluid
  • Left periaortic retroperitoneal LN 13mm

Impression per radiology: "Suspicious for early pleural and mediastinal metastatic disease, potentially early thoracic lymphangitic carcinomatosis." Implications for report: This confirms the Stage IV designation via pleural involvement and validates the report's emphasis on diaphragmatic/pleural migration pathways as a recurrence mechanism. The low-volume thoracic disease is encouraging — it suggests the "pleural seeding" is early and may respond well to systemic therapy + bevacizumab (which specifically targets VEGF-mediated effusions). Post-cycle-3 chest imaging will be critical for response assessment.

D. Chemo Tracking — Treatment Tolerance & Metabolic Insights

Chemotherapy Doses:

  • Paclitaxel 339 mg (consistent with 175 mg/m² for BSA ~1.94)
  • Carboplatin 714 mg (consistent with AUC 5-6 for normal renal function)
  • Bevacizumab 1200 mg (consistent with 15 mg/kg for ~80 kg body weight)

Dexamethasone Exposure (Hyperglycemia Context):

  • Cycle 1: Dexamethasone 8mg × 3 days (Apr 9-11)
  • Cycle 2: Dexamethasone 8mg × 4 days (Apr 29 – May 2)
  • Glucose on chemo days: 97 mg/dL (Apr 9 and Apr 29) — normal despite dexamethasone

This is reassuring: steroid-induced hyperglycemia is NOT currently manifest in fasting labs. However, dexamethasone causes postprandial spikes that fasting glucose may miss — this is exactly where CGM would provide additional data.

Supplement Regimen (Already Taking):

  • ✅ B12 1000 mcg daily (started Apr 9; doubled to 2000 mcg from May 4)
  • ✅ Vitamin D3 110 mcg (4,400 IU) daily
  • ✅ Omega-3 2000mg daily
  • ✅ Magnesium glycinate 400mg (sleep)
  • ✅ Magnesium threonate 288mg (neuropathy/brain) — discontinued after cycle 1
  • ✅ Alpha Lipoic Acid 600mg (neuropathy, blood sugar) — started cycle 2
  • ✅ L-Glutamine 5g (GI, neuropathy) — intermittent
  • ✅ Lipitor 10mg daily (cholesterol)
  • ✅ Melatonin 10mg nightly

Update to report: The patient is already implementing many recommended supplements. B12 supplementation began at cycle 1 (1000 mcg) and was increased. Alpha Lipoic Acid (600mg) was added for neuropathy at cycle 2 — this has some evidence for CIPN prevention. The supplement strategy is well-designed.

Exercise Tracking:

  • Strength training: 30 min sessions, ~3-4x/week consistently through both cycles
  • Steps: 4,500-13,000/day (averaging ~6,500) — remarkably active during chemo
  • HRV: 20-41 ms (low range typical during chemo; trending slightly up toward end of cycle 2)
  • Sleep: 7-10 hours/night, quality 63-95% (excellent adherence to sleep hygiene)

Nutrition:

  • Calories: 500-1850/day (low day 1 post-infusion, recovering by day 3-4)
  • Protein: 37-120g/day (averaging ~80g — good; target is ≥1.2 g/kg = ~96g for ~80kg)
  • Fiber: 6-44g/day (variable)

No change to recommendations — the patient is already executing the exercise and nutrition strategy at a high level. Consider pushing protein slightly higher (aim for 95-100g/day consistently) on days appetite allows.

E. Clinical Observation: Increased Stool Diameter — Possible Sigmoid Response

Patient-reported: Stool diameter increased from ~1 cm (pre-treatment) to ~2 cm (after 2 cycles).

Clinical Interpretation:

The initial CT (March 18, 2026) documented tumor tethering/adherence to the sigmoid colon causing stricture. A narrowed sigmoid lumen would compress stool into a thinner caliber — exactly what was observed pre-treatment.

The doubling of stool diameter is a plausible functional indicator that:

1. The tumor mass is shrinking and releasing extrinsic compression on the sigmoid

2. Peritumoral inflammation/edema is resolving (bevacizumab reduces VEGF-mediated swelling)

3. The sigmoid lumen is re-opening

Clinical significance:
  • Supports chemotherapy response — consistent with the CA-125 decline
  • Favorable for surgical planning — if the sigmoid is no longer tethered, bowel resection may be avoidable at interval debulking (significant QOL difference)
  • Relevant to bevacizumab safety — bowel that has been invaded/tethered by tumor is the primary site of bev-associated perforation risk. If the tumor is releasing, this risk may decrease (though the area of prior involvement remains a site of vulnerability)

Recommendation: Report this observation to Dr. BonDurant before surgery. It informs the surgical approach and bowel perforation risk assessment.

F. B12 Status — Corrected Data

DateB12 (pg/mL)Status

Jan 19, 2026177🔴 Deficient
Mar 20, 2026262🟡 Low-normal (suboptimal for neuroprotection)
Apr 9 onwardSupplementing 1000-2000 mcg/day✅ Correction in progress

The report's recommendation for B12 supplementation remains correct but the urgency is reduced — the patien


[Truncated for app. Full version in Word doc.]*